The Dark Horse 1932 Colorized

The Dark Horse 1932 Colorized Review: A Political Comedy Classic from the Pre-Code Era

Introduction

“The Dark Horse” (1932) is a pre-Code political satire that, while often overlooked in the broader scope of classic cinema, delivers sharp wit, clever dialogue, and biting commentary on the absurdities of political campaigns. Directed by Alfred E. Green and featuring an unforgettable performance by the legendary Warren William, this film captures the chaotic energy and humorous intrigue of a U.S. gubernatorial election with a blend of satire, farce, and timely humor.

Set during a time of significant social and political change, “The Dark Horse” offers a timely reflection on political machinations that remain surprisingly relevant even today. Though it is less known than other pre-Code films, its satirical edge, fast-paced narrative, and smart performances make it a gem worth revisiting. In this article, we will dive into the significance of “The Dark Horse” as a political comedy, explore its key performances, discuss its place in film history, and examine the continued relevance of its biting satire.

Check The Full Colorized Movies List

Check Our YouTube Channel

Check Our Colorized Movies Trailer Channel

Understanding The Dark Horse 1932 Colorized: Director, Cast, and Genre

“The Dark Horse” was directed by Alfred E. Green, a prolific filmmaker of the 1920s and 1930s known for his versatility across genres. While Green may not have the same name recognition as some of his contemporaries, he had an impressive career that spanned five decades, directing films from musicals and comedies to dramas and action-packed spectacles. With “The Dark Horse,” Green showed his adeptness at handling political satire, keeping the film brisk, energetic, and full of clever twists.

At the heart of the film is Warren William, who plays the charismatic and calculating political strategist Hal Blake. Known as the “King of Pre-Code,” William often portrayed charming but morally ambiguous characters, and his role in “The Dark Horse” is no exception. His performance is central to the film’s success, as he deftly balances the comedic aspects of the plot with the more cynical undertones of political manipulation. William’s charm and sharp wit bring Blake to life as a fast-talking, ruthless operator who always has a scheme up his sleeve.

Opposite William is Bette Davis, in an early role as Kay Russell, Blake’s quick-witted secretary and love interest. Davis’s natural charisma and comedic timing shine in this film, giving her character a sharp edge and foreshadowing the strong performances she would deliver throughout her illustrious career. The supporting cast includes Guy Kibbee as Zachary Hicks, the titular “dark horse” candidate—an unqualified, bumbling candidate whose political ignorance serves as the film’s primary source of humor and critique of electoral politics.

As for genre, “The Dark Horse” is a political comedy, but it also contains elements of farce and social satire. The film lampoons the absurdity of political campaigns, the fickleness of voters, and the manipulation by political operatives behind the scenes. Though lighthearted in tone, the film’s critique of the electoral process reflects the cynicism of the era and remains eerily relevant in today’s political climate.

Exploring the World of The Dark Horse 1932 Colorized: Plot and Characters

The story of “The Dark Horse” revolves around a gubernatorial campaign in which an inexperienced and entirely unqualified candidate, Zachary Hicks (played by Guy Kibbee), accidentally becomes the nominee for governor. A bumbling, clueless figure, Hicks is thrust into the political spotlight by the leaders of the Progressive Party, who realize they’ve made a grave mistake but are now stuck with him as their candidate.

Desperate to turn their gaffe into a victory, the party enlists the help of Hal Blake (Warren William), a down-and-out political fixer who’s just been released from jail. Blake agrees to manage Hicks’ campaign, using every dirty trick in the book to sway voters and steer his client toward victory. As Blake orchestrates the campaign, manipulating the media and the public with his crafty strategies, the film reveals the absurd lengths to which political operatives will go to win an election.

At Blake’s side is his secretary Kay Russell (Bette Davis), who plays a pivotal role in keeping the chaotic campaign on track. While Blake navigates the world of political corruption with skill and cunning, it’s often Kay’s practicality and quick thinking that save the day, offering a sharp commentary on the role of women in a male-dominated political sphere.

As the campaign escalates, the film becomes a whirlwind of comedic misadventures, including staged photo opportunities, fabricated public endorsements, and manufactured controversies. The plot drives forward with rapid-fire dialogue, unexpected twists, and slapstick moments that add to the film’s overall sense of absurdity.

The heart of the film lies in the tension between Blake’s ruthless political strategies and the fundamental incompetence of Hicks, who often threatens to undo all of Blake’s hard work with his bumbling speeches and lack of political savvy. But beneath the comedy lies a biting critique of how easily voters can be manipulated by image over substance and how political campaigns often prioritize winning over principles.

The Pre-Code Era: A Time of Creative Freedom

“The Dark Horse” was made during Hollywood’s pre-Code era, a period between 1929 and 1934 before the enforcement of the Hays Code, which censored content deemed inappropriate or immoral by industry standards. The pre-Code years were marked by a freer exploration of controversial themes such as politics, crime, sex, and corruption, allowing filmmakers to push boundaries and address real-world issues in a more direct and sometimes provocative manner.

This period allowed films like “The Dark Horse” to engage in sharp political satire without fear of censorship. The film’s critique of political campaigns, corrupt political operatives, and the manipulation of voters likely would have been watered down or entirely suppressed under the strict regulations that followed the adoption of the Hays Code in 1934.

The humor in “The Dark Horse” is quick and biting, with moments of innuendo and sly commentary that would have been far more restricted in later years. This creative freedom allowed filmmakers like Alfred E. Green to craft stories that reflected the skepticism and cynicism of the public during the Great Depression, an era when trust in political leaders and institutions was at an all-time low.

The Political Satire of The Dark Horse 1932 Colorized: Humor with a Message

While “The Dark Horse” is a comedy first and foremost, its satire offers a deeper reflection on the nature of political campaigns. Zachary Hicks is an embodiment of the “dark horse” candidate—someone who comes out of nowhere, with no experience or qualifications, to win an election. His cluelessness and bumbling personality serve as a stark contrast to the slick, manipulative political machinery that Hal Blake operates.

Through Hicks, the film critiques how easily the public can be swayed by charm and empty promises rather than substance. The fact that a completely unqualified candidate can come close to winning an election, simply because of Blake’s savvy manipulation of the media and public perception, speaks to the power of political operatives and the superficiality of campaign politics. In this way, “The Dark Horse” offers a timeless critique of the electoral process, one that feels eerily familiar in today’s political landscape.

Blake’s character, while charming and entertaining, represents the cynical side of politics, where winning is everything, and ethics are secondary. His willingness to employ underhanded tactics—lying to the public, manipulating the press, and exploiting Hicks’ ignorance—paints a less-than-flattering picture of political campaign managers. Yet, Warren William’s portrayal of Blake makes him likable, even as he engages in morally questionable behavior, a testament to the actor’s talent in playing charming antiheroes.

The Role of Bette Davis in The Dark Horse 1932 Colorized

Bette Davis, who was just starting her ascent to stardom in 1932, plays a vital role in “The Dark Horse” as Kay Russell. While Davis would later become known for her intense, dramatic performances, her role in this film demonstrates her versatility and early flair for comedy.

Kay is smart, capable, and not afraid to speak her mind, traits that would become hallmarks of many of Davis’s later roles. In “The Dark Horse,” she serves as Blake’s confidante and co-conspirator, often helping him out of tight situations. Though she is technically Blake’s secretary, her character is much more than a mere assistant; she is essential to the campaign’s success, often coming up with ideas and strategies that Blake adopts.

Davis’s performance adds a layer of sophistication to the film. Her character’s wit and intelligence make her a perfect match for Blake, and their repartee forms the backbone of the film’s comedic dynamic. Kay Russell is one of the few characters who sees through the façade of political campaigns, and Davis imbues her with a blend of charm, practicality, and subtle rebellion against the male-dominated world of politics.

The Relevance of The Dark Horse 1932 Colorized Today

Although “The Dark Horse” was made over 90 years ago, its themes remain strikingly relevant. The film’s exploration of media manipulation, the superficiality of political campaigns, and the public’s susceptibility to empty rhetoric all resonate with modern audiences. In an era of 24-hour news cycles, social media, and image-driven politics, “The Dark Horse” feels prescient in its portrayal of how easily voters can be swayed by spectacle rather than substance.

The film’s critique of the political process also speaks to a larger conversation about democracy and the responsibilities of both politicians and voters. While “The Dark Horse” delivers its message with humor and farce, it ultimately raises important questions about the integrity of elections and the role of political operatives in shaping public opinion.

Reception and Legacy of The Dark Horse 1932 Colorized

At the time of its release, “The Dark Horse” was well-received for its sharp humor and fast-paced narrative. Critics praised the performances of Warren William and Bette Davis, as well as the film’s timely satire of political campaigns. While it may not have been a blockbuster, the film has since gained recognition as an important example of pre-Code filmmaking, particularly for its fearless engagement with political themes.

In the years since, “The Dark Horse” has been rediscovered by fans of classic cinema, particularly those interested in the pre-Code era. Its biting satire and engaging performances have helped it endure as a relevant and entertaining political comedy.

Conclusion

“The Dark Horse” (1932) stands as a testament to the creative freedom of the pre-Code era and remains a sharp, witty political comedy that continues to resonate with modern audiences. With stellar performances from Warren William and Bette Davis, and Alfred E. Green’s deft direction, the film offers both laughs and insightful commentary on the absurdities of political campaigns.

In a time when the lines between entertainment and politics are increasingly blurred, “The Dark Horse” feels as timely as ever. Its exploration of media manipulation, public perception, and political strategy serves as a reminder that, while the times may have changed, the game of politics remains much the same. For fans of classic cinema, political satire, or simply clever, well-executed comedy, “The Dark Horse” is a film that deserves to be revisited and appreciated for its wit, humor, and relevance.